The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^2, INF).

(0) Obligation:

Runtime Complexity TRS:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

plus(x, 0) → x
plus(0, y) → y
plus(s(x), y) → s(plus(x, y))
times(0, y) → 0
times(s(0), y) → y
times(s(x), y) → plus(y, times(x, y))
div(0, y) → 0
div(x, y) → quot(x, y, y)
quot(0, s(y), z) → 0
quot(s(x), s(y), z) → quot(x, y, z)
quot(x, 0, s(z)) → s(div(x, s(z)))
div(div(x, y), z) → div(x, times(y, z))
eq(0, 0) → true
eq(s(x), 0) → false
eq(0, s(y)) → false
eq(s(x), s(y)) → eq(x, y)
divides(y, x) → eq(x, times(div(x, y), y))
prime(s(s(x))) → pr(s(s(x)), s(x))
pr(x, s(0)) → true
pr(x, s(s(y))) → if(divides(s(s(y)), x), x, s(y))
if(true, x, y) → false
if(false, x, y) → pr(x, y)

Rewrite Strategy: FULL

(1) DecreasingLoopProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The following loop(s) give(s) rise to the lower bound Ω(n¹):
The rewrite sequence
plus(s(x), y) →⁺ s(plus(x, y))
gives rise to a decreasing loop by considering the right hand sides subterm at position [0].
The pumping substitution is [x / s(x)].
The result substitution is [ ].

(2) BOUNDS(n^1, INF)

(3) RenamingProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Renamed function symbols to avoid clashes with predefined symbol.

(4) Obligation:

Runtime Complexity Relative TRS:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

plus(x, 0') → x
plus(0', y) → y
plus(s(x), y) → s(plus(x, y))
times(0', y) → 0'
times(s(0'), y) → y
times(s(x), y) → plus(y, times(x, y))
div(0', y) → 0'
div(x, y) → quot(x, y, y)
quot(0', s(y), z) → 0'
quot(s(x), s(y), z) → quot(x, y, z)
quot(x, 0', s(z)) → s(div(x, s(z)))
div(div(x, y), z) → div(x, times(y, z))
eq(0', 0') → true
eq(s(x), 0') → false
eq(0', s(y)) → false
eq(s(x), s(y)) → eq(x, y)
divides(y, x) → eq(x, times(div(x, y), y))
prime(s(s(x))) → pr(s(s(x)), s(x))
pr(x, s(0')) → true
pr(x, s(s(y))) → if(divides(s(s(y)), x), x, s(y))
if(true, x, y) → false
if(false, x, y) → pr(x, y)

S is empty.
Rewrite Strategy: FULL

(5) TypeInferenceProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID) transformation)

Infered types.

(6) Obligation:

TRS:
Rules:
plus(x, 0') → x
plus(0', y) → y
plus(s(x), y) → s(plus(x, y))
times(0', y) → 0'
times(s(0'), y) → y
times(s(x), y) → plus(y, times(x, y))
div(0', y) → 0'
div(x, y) → quot(x, y, y)
quot(0', s(y), z) → 0'
quot(s(x), s(y), z) → quot(x, y, z)
quot(x, 0', s(z)) → s(div(x, s(z)))
div(div(x, y), z) → div(x, times(y, z))
eq(0', 0') → true
eq(s(x), 0') → false
eq(0', s(y)) → false
eq(s(x), s(y)) → eq(x, y)
divides(y, x) → eq(x, times(div(x, y), y))
prime(s(s(x))) → pr(s(s(x)), s(x))
pr(x, s(0')) → true
pr(x, s(s(y))) → if(divides(s(s(y)), x), x, s(y))
if(true, x, y) → false
if(false, x, y) → pr(x, y)

Types:
plus :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
0' :: 0':s
s :: 0':s → 0':s
times :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
div :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
quot :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
eq :: 0':s → 0':s → true:false
true :: true:false
false :: true:false
divides :: 0':s → 0':s → true:false
prime :: 0':s → true:false
pr :: 0':s → 0':s → true:false
if :: true:false → 0':s → 0':s → true:false
hole_0':s1_0 :: 0':s
hole_true:false2_0 :: true:false
gen_0':s3_0 :: Nat → 0':s

(7) OrderProof (LOWER BOUND(ID) transformation)

Heuristically decided to analyse the following defined symbols:
plus, times, div, quot, eq, pr

They will be analysed ascendingly in the following order:
plus < times
times < div
div = quot

(8) Obligation:

TRS:
Rules:
plus(x, 0') → x
plus(0', y) → y
plus(s(x), y) → s(plus(x, y))
times(0', y) → 0'
times(s(0'), y) → y
times(s(x), y) → plus(y, times(x, y))
div(0', y) → 0'
div(x, y) → quot(x, y, y)
quot(0', s(y), z) → 0'
quot(s(x), s(y), z) → quot(x, y, z)
quot(x, 0', s(z)) → s(div(x, s(z)))
div(div(x, y), z) → div(x, times(y, z))
eq(0', 0') → true
eq(s(x), 0') → false
eq(0', s(y)) → false
eq(s(x), s(y)) → eq(x, y)
divides(y, x) → eq(x, times(div(x, y), y))
prime(s(s(x))) → pr(s(s(x)), s(x))
pr(x, s(0')) → true
pr(x, s(s(y))) → if(divides(s(s(y)), x), x, s(y))
if(true, x, y) → false
if(false, x, y) → pr(x, y)

Types:
plus :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
0' :: 0':s
s :: 0':s → 0':s
times :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
div :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
quot :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
eq :: 0':s → 0':s → true:false
true :: true:false
false :: true:false
divides :: 0':s → 0':s → true:false
prime :: 0':s → true:false
pr :: 0':s → 0':s → true:false
if :: true:false → 0':s → 0':s → true:false
hole_0':s1_0 :: 0':s
hole_true:false2_0 :: true:false
gen_0':s3_0 :: Nat → 0':s

Generator Equations:
gen_0':s3_0(0) ⇔ 0'
gen_0':s3_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ s(gen_0':s3_0(x))

The following defined symbols remain to be analysed:
plus, times, div, quot, eq, pr

They will be analysed ascendingly in the following order:
plus < times
times < div
div = quot

(9) RewriteLemmaProof (LOWER BOUND(ID) transformation)

Proved the following rewrite lemma:
plus(gen_0':s3_0(n5_0), gen_0':s3_0(b)) → gen_0':s3_0(+(n5_0, b)), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n5₀)

Induction Base:
plus(gen_0':s3_0(0), gen_0':s3_0(b)) →_R^Ω(1)
gen_0':s3_0(b)

Induction Step:
plus(gen_0':s3_0(+(n5_0, 1)), gen_0':s3_0(b)) →_R^Ω(1)
s(plus(gen_0':s3_0(n5_0), gen_0':s3_0(b))) →_IH
s(gen_0':s3_0(+(b, c6_0)))

We have rt ∈ Ω(n¹) and sz ∈ O(n). Thus, we have irc_R ∈ Ω(n).

(10) Complex Obligation (BEST)

(11) Obligation:

TRS:
Rules:
plus(x, 0') → x
plus(0', y) → y
plus(s(x), y) → s(plus(x, y))
times(0', y) → 0'
times(s(0'), y) → y
times(s(x), y) → plus(y, times(x, y))
div(0', y) → 0'
div(x, y) → quot(x, y, y)
quot(0', s(y), z) → 0'
quot(s(x), s(y), z) → quot(x, y, z)
quot(x, 0', s(z)) → s(div(x, s(z)))
div(div(x, y), z) → div(x, times(y, z))
eq(0', 0') → true
eq(s(x), 0') → false
eq(0', s(y)) → false
eq(s(x), s(y)) → eq(x, y)
divides(y, x) → eq(x, times(div(x, y), y))
prime(s(s(x))) → pr(s(s(x)), s(x))
pr(x, s(0')) → true
pr(x, s(s(y))) → if(divides(s(s(y)), x), x, s(y))
if(true, x, y) → false
if(false, x, y) → pr(x, y)

Types:
plus :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
0' :: 0':s
s :: 0':s → 0':s
times :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
div :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
quot :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
eq :: 0':s → 0':s → true:false
true :: true:false
false :: true:false
divides :: 0':s → 0':s → true:false
prime :: 0':s → true:false
pr :: 0':s → 0':s → true:false
if :: true:false → 0':s → 0':s → true:false
hole_0':s1_0 :: 0':s
hole_true:false2_0 :: true:false
gen_0':s3_0 :: Nat → 0':s

Lemmas:
plus(gen_0':s3_0(n5_0), gen_0':s3_0(b)) → gen_0':s3_0(+(n5_0, b)), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n5₀)

Generator Equations:
gen_0':s3_0(0) ⇔ 0'
gen_0':s3_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ s(gen_0':s3_0(x))

The following defined symbols remain to be analysed:
times, div, quot, eq, pr

They will be analysed ascendingly in the following order:
times < div
div = quot

(12) RewriteLemmaProof (LOWER BOUND(ID) transformation)

Proved the following rewrite lemma:
times(gen_0':s3_0(n758_0), gen_0':s3_0(b)) → gen_0':s3_0(*(n758_0, b)), rt ∈ Ω(1 + b·n758₀ + n758₀)

Induction Base:
times(gen_0':s3_0(0), gen_0':s3_0(b)) →_R^Ω(1)
0'

Induction Step:
times(gen_0':s3_0(+(n758_0, 1)), gen_0':s3_0(b)) →_R^Ω(1)
plus(gen_0':s3_0(b), times(gen_0':s3_0(n758_0), gen_0':s3_0(b))) →_IH
plus(gen_0':s3_0(b), gen_0':s3_0(*(c759_0, b))) →_L^{Ω(1 + b)}
gen_0':s3_0(+(b, *(n758_0, b)))

We have rt ∈ Ω(n²) and sz ∈ O(n). Thus, we have irc_R ∈ Ω(n²).

(13) Complex Obligation (BEST)

(14) Obligation:

TRS:
Rules:
plus(x, 0') → x
plus(0', y) → y
plus(s(x), y) → s(plus(x, y))
times(0', y) → 0'
times(s(0'), y) → y
times(s(x), y) → plus(y, times(x, y))
div(0', y) → 0'
div(x, y) → quot(x, y, y)
quot(0', s(y), z) → 0'
quot(s(x), s(y), z) → quot(x, y, z)
quot(x, 0', s(z)) → s(div(x, s(z)))
div(div(x, y), z) → div(x, times(y, z))
eq(0', 0') → true
eq(s(x), 0') → false
eq(0', s(y)) → false
eq(s(x), s(y)) → eq(x, y)
divides(y, x) → eq(x, times(div(x, y), y))
prime(s(s(x))) → pr(s(s(x)), s(x))
pr(x, s(0')) → true
pr(x, s(s(y))) → if(divides(s(s(y)), x), x, s(y))
if(true, x, y) → false
if(false, x, y) → pr(x, y)

Types:
plus :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
0' :: 0':s
s :: 0':s → 0':s
times :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
div :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
quot :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
eq :: 0':s → 0':s → true:false
true :: true:false
false :: true:false
divides :: 0':s → 0':s → true:false
prime :: 0':s → true:false
pr :: 0':s → 0':s → true:false
if :: true:false → 0':s → 0':s → true:false
hole_0':s1_0 :: 0':s
hole_true:false2_0 :: true:false
gen_0':s3_0 :: Nat → 0':s

Lemmas:
plus(gen_0':s3_0(n5_0), gen_0':s3_0(b)) → gen_0':s3_0(+(n5_0, b)), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n5₀)
times(gen_0':s3_0(n758_0), gen_0':s3_0(b)) → gen_0':s3_0(*(n758_0, b)), rt ∈ Ω(1 + b·n758₀ + n758₀)

Generator Equations:
gen_0':s3_0(0) ⇔ 0'
gen_0':s3_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ s(gen_0':s3_0(x))

The following defined symbols remain to be analysed:
eq, div, quot, pr

They will be analysed ascendingly in the following order:
div = quot

(15) RewriteLemmaProof (LOWER BOUND(ID) transformation)

Proved the following rewrite lemma:
eq(gen_0':s3_0(n1791_0), gen_0':s3_0(n1791_0)) → true, rt ∈ Ω(1 + n1791₀)

Induction Base:
eq(gen_0':s3_0(0), gen_0':s3_0(0)) →_R^Ω(1)
true

Induction Step:
eq(gen_0':s3_0(+(n1791_0, 1)), gen_0':s3_0(+(n1791_0, 1))) →_R^Ω(1)
eq(gen_0':s3_0(n1791_0), gen_0':s3_0(n1791_0)) →_IH
true

We have rt ∈ Ω(n¹) and sz ∈ O(n). Thus, we have irc_R ∈ Ω(n).

(16) Complex Obligation (BEST)

(17) Obligation:

TRS:
Rules:
plus(x, 0') → x
plus(0', y) → y
plus(s(x), y) → s(plus(x, y))
times(0', y) → 0'
times(s(0'), y) → y
times(s(x), y) → plus(y, times(x, y))
div(0', y) → 0'
div(x, y) → quot(x, y, y)
quot(0', s(y), z) → 0'
quot(s(x), s(y), z) → quot(x, y, z)
quot(x, 0', s(z)) → s(div(x, s(z)))
div(div(x, y), z) → div(x, times(y, z))
eq(0', 0') → true
eq(s(x), 0') → false
eq(0', s(y)) → false
eq(s(x), s(y)) → eq(x, y)
divides(y, x) → eq(x, times(div(x, y), y))
prime(s(s(x))) → pr(s(s(x)), s(x))
pr(x, s(0')) → true
pr(x, s(s(y))) → if(divides(s(s(y)), x), x, s(y))
if(true, x, y) → false
if(false, x, y) → pr(x, y)

Types:
plus :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
0' :: 0':s
s :: 0':s → 0':s
times :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
div :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
quot :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
eq :: 0':s → 0':s → true:false
true :: true:false
false :: true:false
divides :: 0':s → 0':s → true:false
prime :: 0':s → true:false
pr :: 0':s → 0':s → true:false
if :: true:false → 0':s → 0':s → true:false
hole_0':s1_0 :: 0':s
hole_true:false2_0 :: true:false
gen_0':s3_0 :: Nat → 0':s

Lemmas:
plus(gen_0':s3_0(n5_0), gen_0':s3_0(b)) → gen_0':s3_0(+(n5_0, b)), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n5₀)
times(gen_0':s3_0(n758_0), gen_0':s3_0(b)) → gen_0':s3_0(*(n758_0, b)), rt ∈ Ω(1 + b·n758₀ + n758₀)
eq(gen_0':s3_0(n1791_0), gen_0':s3_0(n1791_0)) → true, rt ∈ Ω(1 + n1791₀)

Generator Equations:
gen_0':s3_0(0) ⇔ 0'
gen_0':s3_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ s(gen_0':s3_0(x))

The following defined symbols remain to be analysed:
pr, div, quot

They will be analysed ascendingly in the following order:
div = quot

(18) NoRewriteLemmaProof (LOWER BOUND(ID) transformation)

Could not prove a rewrite lemma for the defined symbol pr.

(19) Obligation:

TRS:
Rules:
plus(x, 0') → x
plus(0', y) → y
plus(s(x), y) → s(plus(x, y))
times(0', y) → 0'
times(s(0'), y) → y
times(s(x), y) → plus(y, times(x, y))
div(0', y) → 0'
div(x, y) → quot(x, y, y)
quot(0', s(y), z) → 0'
quot(s(x), s(y), z) → quot(x, y, z)
quot(x, 0', s(z)) → s(div(x, s(z)))
div(div(x, y), z) → div(x, times(y, z))
eq(0', 0') → true
eq(s(x), 0') → false
eq(0', s(y)) → false
eq(s(x), s(y)) → eq(x, y)
divides(y, x) → eq(x, times(div(x, y), y))
prime(s(s(x))) → pr(s(s(x)), s(x))
pr(x, s(0')) → true
pr(x, s(s(y))) → if(divides(s(s(y)), x), x, s(y))
if(true, x, y) → false
if(false, x, y) → pr(x, y)

Types:
plus :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
0' :: 0':s
s :: 0':s → 0':s
times :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
div :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
quot :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
eq :: 0':s → 0':s → true:false
true :: true:false
false :: true:false
divides :: 0':s → 0':s → true:false
prime :: 0':s → true:false
pr :: 0':s → 0':s → true:false
if :: true:false → 0':s → 0':s → true:false
hole_0':s1_0 :: 0':s
hole_true:false2_0 :: true:false
gen_0':s3_0 :: Nat → 0':s

Lemmas:
plus(gen_0':s3_0(n5_0), gen_0':s3_0(b)) → gen_0':s3_0(+(n5_0, b)), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n5₀)
times(gen_0':s3_0(n758_0), gen_0':s3_0(b)) → gen_0':s3_0(*(n758_0, b)), rt ∈ Ω(1 + b·n758₀ + n758₀)
eq(gen_0':s3_0(n1791_0), gen_0':s3_0(n1791_0)) → true, rt ∈ Ω(1 + n1791₀)

Generator Equations:
gen_0':s3_0(0) ⇔ 0'
gen_0':s3_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ s(gen_0':s3_0(x))

The following defined symbols remain to be analysed:
quot, div

They will be analysed ascendingly in the following order:
div = quot

(20) RewriteLemmaProof (LOWER BOUND(ID) transformation)

Proved the following rewrite lemma:
quot(gen_0':s3_0(n2494_0), gen_0':s3_0(+(1, n2494_0)), gen_0':s3_0(c)) → gen_0':s3_0(0), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n2494₀)

Induction Base:
quot(gen_0':s3_0(0), gen_0':s3_0(+(1, 0)), gen_0':s3_0(c)) →_R^Ω(1)
0'

Induction Step:
quot(gen_0':s3_0(+(n2494_0, 1)), gen_0':s3_0(+(1, +(n2494_0, 1))), gen_0':s3_0(c)) →_R^Ω(1)
quot(gen_0':s3_0(n2494_0), gen_0':s3_0(+(1, n2494_0)), gen_0':s3_0(c)) →_IH
gen_0':s3_0(0)

We have rt ∈ Ω(n¹) and sz ∈ O(n). Thus, we have irc_R ∈ Ω(n).

(21) Complex Obligation (BEST)

(22) Obligation:

TRS:
Rules:
plus(x, 0') → x
plus(0', y) → y
plus(s(x), y) → s(plus(x, y))
times(0', y) → 0'
times(s(0'), y) → y
times(s(x), y) → plus(y, times(x, y))
div(0', y) → 0'
div(x, y) → quot(x, y, y)
quot(0', s(y), z) → 0'
quot(s(x), s(y), z) → quot(x, y, z)
quot(x, 0', s(z)) → s(div(x, s(z)))
div(div(x, y), z) → div(x, times(y, z))
eq(0', 0') → true
eq(s(x), 0') → false
eq(0', s(y)) → false
eq(s(x), s(y)) → eq(x, y)
divides(y, x) → eq(x, times(div(x, y), y))
prime(s(s(x))) → pr(s(s(x)), s(x))
pr(x, s(0')) → true
pr(x, s(s(y))) → if(divides(s(s(y)), x), x, s(y))
if(true, x, y) → false
if(false, x, y) → pr(x, y)

Types:
plus :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
0' :: 0':s
s :: 0':s → 0':s
times :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
div :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
quot :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
eq :: 0':s → 0':s → true:false
true :: true:false
false :: true:false
divides :: 0':s → 0':s → true:false
prime :: 0':s → true:false
pr :: 0':s → 0':s → true:false
if :: true:false → 0':s → 0':s → true:false
hole_0':s1_0 :: 0':s
hole_true:false2_0 :: true:false
gen_0':s3_0 :: Nat → 0':s

Lemmas:
plus(gen_0':s3_0(n5_0), gen_0':s3_0(b)) → gen_0':s3_0(+(n5_0, b)), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n5₀)
times(gen_0':s3_0(n758_0), gen_0':s3_0(b)) → gen_0':s3_0(*(n758_0, b)), rt ∈ Ω(1 + b·n758₀ + n758₀)
eq(gen_0':s3_0(n1791_0), gen_0':s3_0(n1791_0)) → true, rt ∈ Ω(1 + n1791₀)
quot(gen_0':s3_0(n2494_0), gen_0':s3_0(+(1, n2494_0)), gen_0':s3_0(c)) → gen_0':s3_0(0), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n2494₀)

Generator Equations:
gen_0':s3_0(0) ⇔ 0'
gen_0':s3_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ s(gen_0':s3_0(x))

The following defined symbols remain to be analysed:
div

They will be analysed ascendingly in the following order:
div = quot

(23) NoRewriteLemmaProof (LOWER BOUND(ID) transformation)

Could not prove a rewrite lemma for the defined symbol div.

(24) Obligation:

TRS:
Rules:
plus(x, 0') → x
plus(0', y) → y
plus(s(x), y) → s(plus(x, y))
times(0', y) → 0'
times(s(0'), y) → y
times(s(x), y) → plus(y, times(x, y))
div(0', y) → 0'
div(x, y) → quot(x, y, y)
quot(0', s(y), z) → 0'
quot(s(x), s(y), z) → quot(x, y, z)
quot(x, 0', s(z)) → s(div(x, s(z)))
div(div(x, y), z) → div(x, times(y, z))
eq(0', 0') → true
eq(s(x), 0') → false
eq(0', s(y)) → false
eq(s(x), s(y)) → eq(x, y)
divides(y, x) → eq(x, times(div(x, y), y))
prime(s(s(x))) → pr(s(s(x)), s(x))
pr(x, s(0')) → true
pr(x, s(s(y))) → if(divides(s(s(y)), x), x, s(y))
if(true, x, y) → false
if(false, x, y) → pr(x, y)

Types:
plus :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
0' :: 0':s
s :: 0':s → 0':s
times :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
div :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
quot :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
eq :: 0':s → 0':s → true:false
true :: true:false
false :: true:false
divides :: 0':s → 0':s → true:false
prime :: 0':s → true:false
pr :: 0':s → 0':s → true:false
if :: true:false → 0':s → 0':s → true:false
hole_0':s1_0 :: 0':s
hole_true:false2_0 :: true:false
gen_0':s3_0 :: Nat → 0':s

Lemmas:
plus(gen_0':s3_0(n5_0), gen_0':s3_0(b)) → gen_0':s3_0(+(n5_0, b)), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n5₀)
times(gen_0':s3_0(n758_0), gen_0':s3_0(b)) → gen_0':s3_0(*(n758_0, b)), rt ∈ Ω(1 + b·n758₀ + n758₀)
eq(gen_0':s3_0(n1791_0), gen_0':s3_0(n1791_0)) → true, rt ∈ Ω(1 + n1791₀)
quot(gen_0':s3_0(n2494_0), gen_0':s3_0(+(1, n2494_0)), gen_0':s3_0(c)) → gen_0':s3_0(0), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n2494₀)

Generator Equations:
gen_0':s3_0(0) ⇔ 0'
gen_0':s3_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ s(gen_0':s3_0(x))

No more defined symbols left to analyse.

(25) LowerBoundsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The lowerbound Ω(n²) was proven with the following lemma:
times(gen_0':s3_0(n758_0), gen_0':s3_0(b)) → gen_0':s3_0(*(n758_0, b)), rt ∈ Ω(1 + b·n758₀ + n758₀)

(26) BOUNDS(n^2, INF)

(27) Obligation:

TRS:
Rules:
plus(x, 0') → x
plus(0', y) → y
plus(s(x), y) → s(plus(x, y))
times(0', y) → 0'
times(s(0'), y) → y
times(s(x), y) → plus(y, times(x, y))
div(0', y) → 0'
div(x, y) → quot(x, y, y)
quot(0', s(y), z) → 0'
quot(s(x), s(y), z) → quot(x, y, z)
quot(x, 0', s(z)) → s(div(x, s(z)))
div(div(x, y), z) → div(x, times(y, z))
eq(0', 0') → true
eq(s(x), 0') → false
eq(0', s(y)) → false
eq(s(x), s(y)) → eq(x, y)
divides(y, x) → eq(x, times(div(x, y), y))
prime(s(s(x))) → pr(s(s(x)), s(x))
pr(x, s(0')) → true
pr(x, s(s(y))) → if(divides(s(s(y)), x), x, s(y))
if(true, x, y) → false
if(false, x, y) → pr(x, y)

Types:
plus :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
0' :: 0':s
s :: 0':s → 0':s
times :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
div :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
quot :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
eq :: 0':s → 0':s → true:false
true :: true:false
false :: true:false
divides :: 0':s → 0':s → true:false
prime :: 0':s → true:false
pr :: 0':s → 0':s → true:false
if :: true:false → 0':s → 0':s → true:false
hole_0':s1_0 :: 0':s
hole_true:false2_0 :: true:false
gen_0':s3_0 :: Nat → 0':s

Lemmas:
plus(gen_0':s3_0(n5_0), gen_0':s3_0(b)) → gen_0':s3_0(+(n5_0, b)), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n5₀)
times(gen_0':s3_0(n758_0), gen_0':s3_0(b)) → gen_0':s3_0(*(n758_0, b)), rt ∈ Ω(1 + b·n758₀ + n758₀)
eq(gen_0':s3_0(n1791_0), gen_0':s3_0(n1791_0)) → true, rt ∈ Ω(1 + n1791₀)
quot(gen_0':s3_0(n2494_0), gen_0':s3_0(+(1, n2494_0)), gen_0':s3_0(c)) → gen_0':s3_0(0), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n2494₀)

Generator Equations:
gen_0':s3_0(0) ⇔ 0'
gen_0':s3_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ s(gen_0':s3_0(x))

No more defined symbols left to analyse.

(28) LowerBoundsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The lowerbound Ω(n²) was proven with the following lemma:
times(gen_0':s3_0(n758_0), gen_0':s3_0(b)) → gen_0':s3_0(*(n758_0, b)), rt ∈ Ω(1 + b·n758₀ + n758₀)

(29) BOUNDS(n^2, INF)

(30) Obligation:

TRS:
Rules:
plus(x, 0') → x
plus(0', y) → y
plus(s(x), y) → s(plus(x, y))
times(0', y) → 0'
times(s(0'), y) → y
times(s(x), y) → plus(y, times(x, y))
div(0', y) → 0'
div(x, y) → quot(x, y, y)
quot(0', s(y), z) → 0'
quot(s(x), s(y), z) → quot(x, y, z)
quot(x, 0', s(z)) → s(div(x, s(z)))
div(div(x, y), z) → div(x, times(y, z))
eq(0', 0') → true
eq(s(x), 0') → false
eq(0', s(y)) → false
eq(s(x), s(y)) → eq(x, y)
divides(y, x) → eq(x, times(div(x, y), y))
prime(s(s(x))) → pr(s(s(x)), s(x))
pr(x, s(0')) → true
pr(x, s(s(y))) → if(divides(s(s(y)), x), x, s(y))
if(true, x, y) → false
if(false, x, y) → pr(x, y)

Types:
plus :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
0' :: 0':s
s :: 0':s → 0':s
times :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
div :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
quot :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
eq :: 0':s → 0':s → true:false
true :: true:false
false :: true:false
divides :: 0':s → 0':s → true:false
prime :: 0':s → true:false
pr :: 0':s → 0':s → true:false
if :: true:false → 0':s → 0':s → true:false
hole_0':s1_0 :: 0':s
hole_true:false2_0 :: true:false
gen_0':s3_0 :: Nat → 0':s

Lemmas:
plus(gen_0':s3_0(n5_0), gen_0':s3_0(b)) → gen_0':s3_0(+(n5_0, b)), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n5₀)
times(gen_0':s3_0(n758_0), gen_0':s3_0(b)) → gen_0':s3_0(*(n758_0, b)), rt ∈ Ω(1 + b·n758₀ + n758₀)
eq(gen_0':s3_0(n1791_0), gen_0':s3_0(n1791_0)) → true, rt ∈ Ω(1 + n1791₀)

Generator Equations:
gen_0':s3_0(0) ⇔ 0'
gen_0':s3_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ s(gen_0':s3_0(x))

No more defined symbols left to analyse.

(31) LowerBoundsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The lowerbound Ω(n²) was proven with the following lemma:
times(gen_0':s3_0(n758_0), gen_0':s3_0(b)) → gen_0':s3_0(*(n758_0, b)), rt ∈ Ω(1 + b·n758₀ + n758₀)

(32) BOUNDS(n^2, INF)

(33) Obligation:

TRS:
Rules:
plus(x, 0') → x
plus(0', y) → y
plus(s(x), y) → s(plus(x, y))
times(0', y) → 0'
times(s(0'), y) → y
times(s(x), y) → plus(y, times(x, y))
div(0', y) → 0'
div(x, y) → quot(x, y, y)
quot(0', s(y), z) → 0'
quot(s(x), s(y), z) → quot(x, y, z)
quot(x, 0', s(z)) → s(div(x, s(z)))
div(div(x, y), z) → div(x, times(y, z))
eq(0', 0') → true
eq(s(x), 0') → false
eq(0', s(y)) → false
eq(s(x), s(y)) → eq(x, y)
divides(y, x) → eq(x, times(div(x, y), y))
prime(s(s(x))) → pr(s(s(x)), s(x))
pr(x, s(0')) → true
pr(x, s(s(y))) → if(divides(s(s(y)), x), x, s(y))
if(true, x, y) → false
if(false, x, y) → pr(x, y)

Types:
plus :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
0' :: 0':s
s :: 0':s → 0':s
times :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
div :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
quot :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
eq :: 0':s → 0':s → true:false
true :: true:false
false :: true:false
divides :: 0':s → 0':s → true:false
prime :: 0':s → true:false
pr :: 0':s → 0':s → true:false
if :: true:false → 0':s → 0':s → true:false
hole_0':s1_0 :: 0':s
hole_true:false2_0 :: true:false
gen_0':s3_0 :: Nat → 0':s

Lemmas:
plus(gen_0':s3_0(n5_0), gen_0':s3_0(b)) → gen_0':s3_0(+(n5_0, b)), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n5₀)
times(gen_0':s3_0(n758_0), gen_0':s3_0(b)) → gen_0':s3_0(*(n758_0, b)), rt ∈ Ω(1 + b·n758₀ + n758₀)

Generator Equations:
gen_0':s3_0(0) ⇔ 0'
gen_0':s3_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ s(gen_0':s3_0(x))

No more defined symbols left to analyse.

(34) LowerBoundsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The lowerbound Ω(n²) was proven with the following lemma:
times(gen_0':s3_0(n758_0), gen_0':s3_0(b)) → gen_0':s3_0(*(n758_0, b)), rt ∈ Ω(1 + b·n758₀ + n758₀)

(35) BOUNDS(n^2, INF)

(36) Obligation:

TRS:
Rules:
plus(x, 0') → x
plus(0', y) → y
plus(s(x), y) → s(plus(x, y))
times(0', y) → 0'
times(s(0'), y) → y
times(s(x), y) → plus(y, times(x, y))
div(0', y) → 0'
div(x, y) → quot(x, y, y)
quot(0', s(y), z) → 0'
quot(s(x), s(y), z) → quot(x, y, z)
quot(x, 0', s(z)) → s(div(x, s(z)))
div(div(x, y), z) → div(x, times(y, z))
eq(0', 0') → true
eq(s(x), 0') → false
eq(0', s(y)) → false
eq(s(x), s(y)) → eq(x, y)
divides(y, x) → eq(x, times(div(x, y), y))
prime(s(s(x))) → pr(s(s(x)), s(x))
pr(x, s(0')) → true
pr(x, s(s(y))) → if(divides(s(s(y)), x), x, s(y))
if(true, x, y) → false
if(false, x, y) → pr(x, y)

Types:
plus :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
0' :: 0':s
s :: 0':s → 0':s
times :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
div :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
quot :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
eq :: 0':s → 0':s → true:false
true :: true:false
false :: true:false
divides :: 0':s → 0':s → true:false
prime :: 0':s → true:false
pr :: 0':s → 0':s → true:false
if :: true:false → 0':s → 0':s → true:false
hole_0':s1_0 :: 0':s
hole_true:false2_0 :: true:false
gen_0':s3_0 :: Nat → 0':s

Lemmas:
plus(gen_0':s3_0(n5_0), gen_0':s3_0(b)) → gen_0':s3_0(+(n5_0, b)), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n5₀)

Generator Equations:
gen_0':s3_0(0) ⇔ 0'
gen_0':s3_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ s(gen_0':s3_0(x))

No more defined symbols left to analyse.

(37) LowerBoundsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The lowerbound Ω(n¹) was proven with the following lemma:
plus(gen_0':s3_0(n5_0), gen_0':s3_0(b)) → gen_0':s3_0(+(n5_0, b)), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n5₀)

(38) BOUNDS(n^1, INF)